Is the use of jammers different in each country?

The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT) and the security issues in its lane have quickly drawn the attention of government and regional agencies and consumers. According to a survey, more than 50 percent of consumers and 90 percent of developers are skeptical about IoT security.
The security problem – and, just as importantly, the security risk that consumers perceive on Internet-connected devices – poses a real threat to hundreds of millions of companies pouring in connected devices of all stripes. And with technology still in its infancy, a finite framework for its security is a demanding task.

A group of unknown hackers broke into the website database and stole the personal and financial information from 32 million users. This data was first published on the “dark web”, which is accessible through a special browser called Tor, but has made its way into the open web, according to CNNMoney. Within a few days of the stolen database that was published online, people associated with many of the exposed accounts were facing extortion at the risk of being outed to family members and colleagues. Victim of this violation at risk of identity theft, extortion fraud and even loss of life.
The hackers used a “botnet” of computers to search the Internet for websites that were vulnerable to attack. Once these websites have been identified, they are targeted with sophisticated SQL injection scripts that gave them access to the website’s database of user information.

Cell phone jammers or gps jammer can help protect your privacy and network security. However, the use of jammers over the phone, there are some disagreements.
Cell phone jammer laws differ around the world. In the UK and Japan, for example, someone can own a jammer – as long as they don’t use it. Dozens of countries including Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Turkey and others allow police or prison officials to use the jammer. Chinese and Indian schools use jammers to stop fraudsters. Mexico enables jammers in churches and hospitals. And Pakistan enables jamming in banks and libraries.

Most countries, including the United States, use it to thwart cellphone jamming bombings against government officials. When President Obama went to Pennsylvania Avenue after taking office, all devices in the area were jammed. The U.S. military uses jammers to stop roadside bombings in Iraq. In fact, harsh jamming laws in the US apply to everyone except federal government officials. Which raises the question: is that correct? US prisons plan to use jammers. So do police. And while we’re at it, many cinemas, restaurants and other shops. Some people want to use jammers. Who decided that only federal officials with cell phone jammers trust?