Mobile jammers have changed our living habits

Mobile jammers are undoubtedly the best way to change the way mobile phones are used. Imagine that when all the students in the classroom are playing the phone and turning on the mobile cell phone jammer, you can immediately regain the dominant position of the classroom. When you need to use it in a quiet place, you will not hear annoying ringtones. When meeting with friends, avoid everyone staring at the screen without talking.

Many parents on school campuses are talking about “mobile war”: With the popularity of mobile phones, many middle school students have a hand or use mobile phones in class to display electronic reading text messages, whether private or private. Cotton around the campus: Proprietary or new features make teachers a headache.

If students misbehave, how can they be punished for using mobile phones in the classroom? Most provinces in Canada are designated. Teachers have the right to take mandatory measures to “must” comply with teaching regulations. Some provinces (such as Ontario) will include more “students using classroom phones” in the category of “interference with teaching tasks”. Obviously, Toronto In a high school in, once saw a student using a mobile phone to e-book in a classroom, the phone was confiscated by the teacher, and was eventually rejected in a joint student protest.

But schools also have the problem of guiding students. The campus of the uneven port school in Victoria Island, British Columbia is flooded with student mobile phones, and the principal Gray bought a “GSM signal jammer” on the campus. As long as someone uses a mobile phone in the surveillance area, the device will quickly interfere with the signal of the mobile phone and make the user feel embarrassed by the embarrassing voice of “please give me the phone”. Although the mobile phone usage rate after the device was used on campus dropped by two-thirds, the students quickly launched an attack and threatened the threat, forcing the critical disassembly of the device to avoid “interfering with the legitimate rights and interests of students” by the provincial education department.