Drones – pose a serious threat to privacy

Gone are the days when Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Unnamed Aircraft or Flying Drones were only visited in James Bond Movies. With the leap in technological advances, these great little vehicles are already made and used by governments, companies and individuals alike to meet their recurring needs.

As funny as it may seem -.

Drone voyeur privacy

“There was a time when people saw these objects on televisions and dreamed of days when such technology would happen, but now that it’s time for drones to be mainstreamed by society, others are emerging Serious privacy issues – These questions need to be answered before we can see that these objects are openly welcomed by people across borders. ”

Drones are already being used in various industries. Real estate agents use them to monitor gas and other pipelines around their projects, the FBI uses them for surveillance and surveillance, companies and individuals use them to take photos and videos, and governments use armed versions for increased wartime protection.

There are a million ways people can use drones, but the most important question that arises from using these objects is not related to what they can achieve or how humans can integrate them into their daily lives

“What would the mainstream use of drones mean in the coming days for the privacy of individuals?”

How do drones affect your privacy?

According to the Federation Aviation Administration, more than 30,000 drones are expected to fly to the skies by 2030. Drones were already part of the threat to privacy through various incidents:

  1. Several UAVs fall on the lawn of the White House
  2. A woman arrested in Mexico for illegal drone shooting on the beach
  3. Drug cartels are known to smuggle stuff across borders with the help of drones
  4. And various other incidents ..

Together with GPS trackers and camcorders we can expect a lot of privacy threats in the coming days.

“With great power comes great responsibility”

Despite all the benefits drones could bring, they will pose the greatest threat to humanity’s privacy.

Let’s take a look at some of the anti-drone techniques (legal and illegal)

  1. Shoot Them Down – If you’ve been a serious victim of the drone invasion, you’re probably on the verge of fire. Do not try to shoot drones, as in many countries not only fire without purpose is illegally triggered, but also drones are shot down.


  1. Signal disturbance – The use of radio spoilers to block drones in your environment is also a very effective way to protect your privacy and prevent the loss of information. While browsing our online stores, you are looking for 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz whining, as all modern drones currently use these frequencies. So if you need a suitable drone jammer, you can check our SPEC5 Jammer.


  1. Geo-fencing – This is a legal way to prevent drones from moving into private or otherwise sensitive areas such as airport terminals, army headquarters, etc. Many drone manufacturers are already implementing it by incorporating these “geofences” into drone firmware.


  1. Simple old legislation – Although this might be a brilliant idea, the only option we have is to let legislators handle these issues and be patient until proper regulatory orders are sanctioned by the government.

What do you think about the increase in drone technology and the threat these UAVs pose to our privacy? Let us know through the comment section below.

12.ignal jammers in prisons to brake the cell phones use

Prison leaders resort to signal stun devices to prevent inmates from using cell phones in prisons.

A document from a correctional department seen by Sowetan says it is in talks with South Africa’s Independent Communications Authority “to explore various technical and legal solutions, including, but not limited to, cell phone jamming.”

The department also wants to distribute the installation of mobile phone detection systems in various prisons to assist officials in identifying and removing unauthorized communication devices.

Mobile phone detectors are currently being installed in 39 prisons, while another 14 body scanners are being used in seven prisons to help regulators stop cell phone smuggling.

According to the Icasa Guide to Using Spectrum Spectrum, the use of jamming devices including mobile phone jammers in South Africa is prohibited for reasons of safety and efficient electronic communication.

But after a signal jammer was used during President Jacob Zuma’s speech earlier this year, Icasa said that the use of jamming equipment by units other than national security cluster divisions is unauthorized and not allowed. At the time, the agency said that national security cluster departments, if supported by relevant security laws, could use jammers in relation to, inter alia, state security functions.

Several media companies and the National Forum of the SA have appealed against the decision of the High Court of Western Cape to declare the use of the signal jammer in Parliament illegal. Prisoners in Pollsmoor, Cape Town, recently caused a stir as they set up their own Facebook page and started posting photos of themselves in their orange prison uniforms.

In June, President Mahube Molemela wrote a report after a legal investigation in Zonderwater Prison in Cullinan, Tshwane.

Molemela noted that the prison had a serious problem of smuggling drugs and cell phones, mainly due to staff shortages and overcrowding of community cells.

But the judge also found out that because the prison had adult elementary students and 11 students from the University of South Africa, it should allow inmates to have laptops in their cells.

“There is no reason why students should not have laptops in their cells, and a laptop that does not have Internet access can pose a threat to the security of the facility,” said Molemela.

The South African courts used to opt in favor of prisoners who are college students who want access to the Internet for their studies, but this must be monitored and used “exclusively for study”.

Icasas Paseka Maleka did not react to the comments made on Thursday. Logan Maistry of Correctional Services said he needed more time to answer