Hi guys! One friend of mine told me that his car was tracked by GPS tracking device and it was OK according to his local court. Still they have violated the Supreme Court ruling that prohibits such tracking, aren’t they? Can we stop that someday and somehow?
We all wanted to strangle them before. There is nothing worse than morons on their cell phones while you try to enjoy a movie, a meal in a restaurant or a quiet nap on the bus or train to work. In fact, listening only one side of a stupid conversation makes us pay more attention than usual. Our brain is waiting for information from both sides of a conversation, and it will try to fill in the blanks. You can try to send the blabber a few bad looks or the old “courtesy cough”, but these passive aggressive gestures rarely work.
n the eyes of many people, the signal jammer is just a tool to block the signal. There is no other goal. You really understand the jammer? Let me briefly explain for you today.
For example, the last case I heard about was in Iowa where some guy named Angel Amaya was accused in drug trafficking and few of his cars were warrantlessly tracked by GPS tracking devices in Iowa and 6 other states. It was the case of so called “good faith” when the suspect is tracked relying on the binding precedent in the Court of Appeals of any US Circuit.
Similar GPS tracking cases were also presented at 7th, 8th and 9th Circuit Courts and they have ruled that warrantless GPS tracking during the cases was legal. Those circuits cover such states as Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, Indiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Alaska, Arizona, North and South Dakota, California, Guam, Mariana Islands, Montana, Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, Washington and Nevada.