Is n’t this the right solution for everyone? I may be wrong, but I think it will succeed. There has never been any problem. As we all know, in addition to simply answering calls and text messages, many smartphones also have a wireless Internet connection. This can be a problem for jammers. I explain now. By calling someone or sending a text message, we use standard GSM radio frequencies. In Europe and Asia, the GSM 900/1800 standard is very common. In the United States, Canada and Latin America, GSM 850/1900 is used. These standards cover the frequency band from 824 to 1990 MHz. The Wi-Fi frequency is completely different. When using a Wi-Fi connection, we run the 2.4 GHz or 2400-2483 MHz band. Therefore, the total frequency band to be scrambled is from 824 to 2483 MHz, which is a fairly wide range. In addition to the wide range of frequencies to be blocked, the necessary jammers must also have configurable output power in order to work in the designated area, so as not to interfere with the communication or interference. To be honest, not every interferer can complete this task. But perfectjammer.com can provide solutions suitable for such specific tasks.
Many wireless networks still use outdated security protocols, such as WEP or WPA. Because they broadcast control packets in decrypted form, they are easily hacked. In this way, the data packets containing the information required for the connection can be intercepted by any Wi-Fi site. All the hacker needs to do is to gather a critical number of data packets sent through the wireless network. Analyze it so that you can fully access it in 5 to 10 minutes. Other protocols (such as EAP-FAST or PEAP MS-CHAPv2) are more reliable. Hackers will have to spend more time hacking these. The only “impenetrable” security protocol for wireless networks is WPA2-Enterprise. But this will not always be reliable. Therefore, you will see that wireless technology not only brings us benefits, but also brings new risks. These risks cannot be minimized or eliminated by the methods used in wired networks. Wi-Fi is banned even in organizations, and some leaders can connect to wireless networks and expose the entire company network to great risks. More and more companies have concluded that Wi-Fi scrambling equipment may be a suitable solution.
Surveillance programs in London and New York were designed and installed in response to terrorist activities. Although the threat of terrorist attacks in London has decreased after the Olympics, all security infrastructure has been left behind. Through the huge CCTV camera network running in the city, all Londoners can feel more secure, but I hope that privacy advocates will express their views on the status of permanent surveillance from Big Brother. Until then, as a citizen of one of these two cities, the only way you can protect your privacy is to use a CCTV portable jammer, which will help you avoid being detected by these cameras.